There are many reasons to chose NVIDIA instead of AMD, the red team must do better in every aspect: upscaling, raytracing, drivers...
i mean why antilag2 is not implemented in the sponsored game? and let's not forget the mess they did with antilag+ (they can't coop with developers)
Moreover, why all the recently released games are not supported by dedicated drivers?
why AMD has troubles with UE5 which is the most common engine?
How it could be that INTEL with its first released graphic card has better raytracing performance and better upscaling? Why Intel cards have a better media engine and on the other hand AMD suck for streaming?
how i could pay 1K for the 7900XTX if i am demolished by a 600$ RTX 4070 super if i switch on raytracing? why i should pay 1K if the RTX4060 streams better than the RX7900XTX?
why the AI accellerator in the 7000 serie are never been used? they are pushing technologies like radeon boost which is useless or HyperRX which is for no reason 7000 exclusive and useless anyway. Let's talk about AFMF2 2.0 which is a good tech but... it's already passed by FSR3 and DLSS3 and will became useless in the next year cause all the new titles will implement FSR frame gen and DLSS frame generation.
Seems that everything they do is wrong and the lack of a new high end tier card in the next generation will push many enthusiasts to buy NVIDIA... And if INTEL does well its job also who wants to buy a budget card to play or to stream or to handle raytracing in modern titles will buy INTEL.
There's something wrong in the radeon company