cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

General Discussions

Zen 3 announcement on Octrober 8th 2020. What are your thoughts?

Zen 3 announcement due on on Octrober 8th 2020. What are your thoughts about it?
Will you be upgrading your existing processor and motherboard immediately after reviews or have you decided to wait for a while and see what user experience is with the new processors and motherboards?

91 Replies

That's how us 1800X adopters felt, premium price no cooler included.

The prices on OverClockers UK

Ryzen 5 5600X • £289.99 

Ryzen 7 5800X • £428.99

Ryzen 9 5900X • £529.99

Ryzen 9 5950X • £749.99

Now if we compare these to the current Ryzen 3000-Series

Ryzen 5 3600X • £229.99 / Core i5 10600K • £248.99

Ryzen 7 3800X • £359.99 / Core i7 10700K • £359.99

Ryzen 9 3900X • £439.99 / Core i9 10900K • £518.99

Ryzen 9 3950X • £679.99 / Core i9 10980Xe • £1099.99

The fact that for the first time EVER Intel Processors will be the "Budget" Option is concerning...

We could cite the cost of N7P as a Production Node., but while this could certainly explain the 10% Price increase for the x950., the x900, x800 are 20% while the x600 is a staggering 25% Higher MSRP.

And it's no coincidence here that the Ryzen 5 x600 Series are by far AMD's "Best Seller" Processors., which is seeing the largest price incease.

But this actually gets much worse if you look at AMD as a Platform, as if we look at the Motherboard using the 500-Series Chipset... well it's just become ridiculous.

Keep in mind that initially (albeit something I was concerned about) the 300-Series Chipset introduced clear feature segmentation., which the previous Fusion Media Chipset never had. 

What I mean is the FM Chipset regardless of which you went with 68H, 78H or 99FX., you still could use the Full Features of your CPU and were able to Overclock... the 300-Series Chipset changed this.

A320 doesn't allow Overclocking, Multi-GPU or XFR

B350 only supports Dual GPU and lacks XFR

X370 supports everything

But it goes further than that., because the price difference substantially increased at the same time.

68H was £45 (on Avg.)

78H was £65 (on Avg.)

99FX was £120 (on Avg.)

A320 was £50 (on Avg.)

B350 was £80 (on Avg.)

X370 was £160 (on Avg.)

And we're seeing a continuation of this trend.

A520 is £65 (Avg.) and lacks support for PCIe 4.0, StoreMI, Multi-GPU, Overclocking, CPU Features and I/O

B550 is £110 (Avg.) and lack support for more than 2 GPU, CPU Features and I/O

X570 is £200 (Avg.) and supports everything.

This bluntly is absolutely disgusting.

Remember we NEED to look at this as a Platform because those of us who didn't upgrade to 400-Series Chipset and Ryzen 3000-Series Processor., well we're looking at paying a clear premium that at this point is GREATER than what we'd be paying switching to Intel.

I wish I was joking here... but I'd like to switch to a Ryzen 5 5600 to replace my current Ryzen 5 1600 + B350 Plus + HyperX FURY 2667MHz 2x8GB

What I paid for what was a "Mid-Range" Platform in 2017 was £340.

Getting the same now and this jumps substantially.

Ryzen 5 5600X + X570 (Prime) + HyperX Predator 3600MHz 2x8GB... well that'll set me back £600 

That's an insane leap in cost... and you might be wondering why to go with an X570 over a B550 like last time., but the lack of support for CPU Features in the A520/B550 Motherboard means PCIe 4.0 Lanes are limited to a set 20x Supported by the Board; this seems like a lot but remember this is shared with the PCIe 3.0 Lanes (you don't get another 10x Dedicated PCIe 3 Lanes., those are ONLY available if you're not using them for PCIe 4.0)

Then there's the USB Limitations., remember prior to the 500-Series USB was handled via the CPU Southbridge... but now said support is entirely limited by the Chipset that shares; so it's a "Up to" Support because well they have to be split to support the other approaches.

X570 supports dedicated 4x HiSpeed + 8x SuperSpeed, with additional falling back to the CPU Support... that's a big deal.

Support for NVMe PCIe 4.0 SSD., which again that's another big deal; as it's ONLY Natively supported via the CPU, which in turn is ONLY Feature Supported on X570.

Sure the performance and features improvements over what I have look impressive at the moment., but they're not DOUBLE the Cost impressive.

IF I went with a more Budget Setup., I'm essentially having to give up on A LOT of the improvements outside of just the performance. 

And for the first time in 20 years I'm seriously looking at switching back to Intel.

Still either direction I go here... I'm going to get screwed. 

I don't understand WHY they're gatekeeping the CPU Features behind the High-End Chipset., or why they've allowed their AIB Partners to increase the Price Point for such beyond what is reasonable.

The High-End Boards should've ALWAYS been what Motherboard Manufacturers overcharge for by using High-End Components, More Ports, Pointless WiFi, High-End Built-In Audio, etc.

It's down to THEM to justify the Prices they're charging... NOT allow them to gatekeep because of the Chipset on them.

Bluntly I don't understand why there isn't simply a SINGLE Chipset., with it being entirely down to Motherboard Manufacturers WHAT of that Chipset they're going to support via what they add to the Board. That would drive competitive pricing and feature support. 

You want to segment the Chipsets... fine go back to adding MEANINGFUL changes., such-as Support for AMD TruAudio Processors, Radeon Graphics, etc. 

This all just has me quite angry. 

Don't forget too that if you want a TRULY budget build right now, and in 2020 this means a 4C/8T processor, you're going to have to go with Intel, with the i3-10100F

https://www.tomshardware.com/news/intel-quietly-launches-core-i3-10100f-to-battle-the-non-existent-ryzen-3-3300x

Don't forget too that Intel next year will be first with DDR5 and PCIe 5 support, so even buying into an Intel setup right now is limited to a "must need" situation rather than "like to have".

And yes, I wholeheartedly agree with the "single chipset" solution, which AMD should have switched to with Socket AM4 when the traditional "northbridge" features were integrated onto the CPU itself, and letting the motherboard partners decide how they're going to utilize it, especially since starting with Socket AM4 AMD's MicroATX and ITX boards have finally become as powerful and as capable as the full size ATX boards, something AMD hasn't ever had, unlike Intel.

Actually if you think about it, AMD already is doing that with Threadripper. All sTRX4 boards ship with the same "chipset", TRX40, and it works perfectly fine, and there are a plethora of boards from ATX to XL-ATX, and I believe there was an mATX board in sTR4 as well, with varying features, from number of PCIe slots, M.2 slots, USB ports, etc..., so it can be done quite successfully. Personally this would be my solution for the next generation, since TR users are (quite typically) much more computer literate than Ryzen:

  • One chipset, AM50
  • Core feature: USB BIOS Flashback present on ALL motherboards
  • Four tiers
    • AM50 Gold / AM50-T3 / AM50-III - Replaces X series chipsets
      • Enthusiast grade components and features
      • All Socket AM5 CPUs supported
      • All chipset resources utilized
      • No requirement for display outputs
      • Form factors ITX to XL-ATX allowed
      • All PCB colors except green allowed
    • AM50 Silver / AM50-T2 / AM50-II – Replaces B series
      • Slightly lower quality components allowed
      • Minimum support for all Socket AM5 CPUs up to 8 cores
      • At least one DisplayPort and HDMI port required
      • Form factors ITX to mATX allowed
      • Green, Black, and White PCB colors disallowed
    • AM50 Bronze / AM50-T1 / AM50-I – Replaces A series
      • Lowest quality components allowed
      • Minimum support for all Socket AM5 CPUs up to 6 cores
      • At least one DisplayPort and HDMI port required
      • Form factors ITX and mATX only
      • Green PCB required
    • AM50 / AM50-EO – OEM, embedded
      • OEM and embedded uses only
      • Form factors ITX to ATX allowed

In this way "hard" product segmentation is limited to minimum CPU core count support, which is not a big deal as people rocking an entry level product are quite unlikely to be rocking a high end CPU, and motherboard form factor, again not a huge deal as fewer used resources means less space is used, and lets the AIB have full control over every aspect, which lets their product segmentation team go wild like they already do with the X570 series.

The lower tiers would not be as "bad" as the requirements suggest as the AIBs would not want to be known for the worst product produced.

0 Likes

Wow....Thanks! You have written a lot here that I did not even realize. B550 is obviously way more gimped that what I realized. So thanks for the eye opener. I had honestly already felt that the B550 boards were more expensive than their B450 boards to begin with but to realize that in many ways that the B450 boards are even superior is all the more reason a budget buy should consider sticking with the older boards if the Zen3 compatibility is truly working well when implemented. 

Having to pay for one of the very high end boards to have not just the high end options but even the options you had on lower boards on earlier chipsets is worse than anything I ever remember Intel doing. 

Unfortunately this move from AMD is not a traditional move for them and solidly places them in the GREED camp IMHO. 

I wish the tech sites had articulated this in reviews as well as you did in a few short paragraphs. It seems that AMD has been able to slip this past most. 

0 Likes

That unloacked variable plot you posted is a mess.
However.
Did you set your GPU Power Limit and Fans to max?

0 Likes

All those numbers are lower than the FE RTX 3080.  Not much lower, but definitely lower. 

ajlueke
Grandmaster

I built up an aggregate using the data AMD presented on RDNA.

 Gears 5MWBL3
RTX 30808410169
RTX 2080 Ti637349
RDNA2738861
vs 2080 Ti16%21%24%
vs 3080-15%-15%-13%

So, just based on this preliminary data, RDNA2 would be almost exactly in between the RX 3070 and RX 3080 in performance.  RDNA will ship with more VRAM, but I wouldn't be surprised to see the RDNA2 GPU take a much bigger hit than the RTX models when things like ray-tracing are turned on.  So now it really depends on price.  The closer the RDNA2 GPU is to the RTX 3070 in price, the better deal it becomes.  Either way, if this holds up in independent testing, RDNA2 will be almost twice as fast as the previous flagship Radeon VII.

It is best to wait for reviews

They are running on R9 5900X CPU which might affect (improve) 4K results versus running on intel CPU.
For the other game data, it is very interesting that no mention of Ray Tracing at all.

That is, after all, suppossed to be a key feature in Big Navi.

I think the GPU will be about the same speed as an RTX3070, as Nvidia will make it that way.

Big Navi looks to be late, and lame.

0 Likes

If they have the same lag between reveal and launch that Zen 3 has, looks like we can expect reviews around Thanksgiving or so.

0 Likes

I think reviews around Thanksgiving is too late.
AMD should have these GPUs reviewed already.
They should be shipping now.

0 Likes

The problem is that if the RX 6900XT launches at $600-$650, they lose, because the 3080 starts at $700 and has DLSS, among other features, that AMD doesn't, and they're facing a market which is upwards of 75%-80% nVidia. It's going to have to be $500 as a reference edition to have a chance.

Also, TomsHardware put together a couple of charts to include the AMD numbers as well.

0 Likes

Here are a couple of benchmarks I just ran, quickly.
Ram is only running running at 2133MHz as I an running Blender and I want max stability.
Ryzen 7 2700X.
RX5700XT.
Borderlands 3 4K Badass.

pastedImage_1.png

pastedImage_2.png

Ryzen 2700x 3.7GHz. 4K Badass.

pastedImage_3.png

Ryzen 2700x 4.3GHz. 4K Badass.
pastedImage_4.png

0 Likes

Ryzen 2700x 4.3GHz. 3200MHz Ram RX5700XT 4K Badass.
pastedImage_1.png

0 Likes

Summary:

BL3 4K Badass settings:

RX5700XT.

Ryzen 7 2700x 3.7GHz 2133 MHz FPS = 29.56
Ryzen 7 2700x 4.3GHz 2133 MHz FPS = 31.34
Ryzen 7 2700x 4.3GHz 3200 MHz FPS = 34.62

0 Likes

What GPU is that with?

0 Likes

Its an RX5700XT I am doing another PC Build and I was testing it.

0 Likes

Note the 17.1% improvement in Benchmark Performance at 4K  from setting:
Ryzen 7 2700x 3.7GHz 2133 MHz
to
Ryzen 7 2700x 4.3GHz 3200 MHz
The CPU performance on this DX12 benchmark really matters, even at 4K Badass.

So if the new Ryzen R9 5900X CPU is much faster and more threads than intel, that may influence the GPU performance lots.

0 Likes

I thinks so. I can't wait to see how much then you loose going to the new 3800x. Probably isn't going to be much. Regardless it does look that Zen3 is another good leap forward. I really am happy for AMD. They really need to buckle down and star working on the stability in all their drivers and software. 

0 Likes

Yes it seems the IPC of +19% is higher than expected and it looks like an ~ o.k. launch.
A Wraith Prism RGB Cooler is $50.
I am not sure if I will upgrade my CPU this year though.

Big Navi looks disappointing.

0 Likes

Big navi looks disappointing...
I think Nvidia will just change the RTX3070 specs and beat it.

0 Likes

Still, have to remember that next generation will bring DDR5 and PCIe5, with USB4 likely as well. Is 19% IPC gain now, which may not even translate to meaningful increased performance in games or even reflect it in real-world usage, worth spending $300+ on, or is it better to save and wait?

https://www.tweaktown.com/news/72104/amd-will-support-ddr5-and-pcie-5-0-in-2022-but-intel-has-first/index.html

0 Likes

I am likely to wait and try to put up with Ryzen 2700x for productivity work and Ryzen 3600 for gaming.
I will likely need to do builds with Ryzen 5000 series this year  / 2021.
I put new personal builds on hold waiting for Zen 3 but I am not convinced the upgrade is worth it, especially since I will have to buy new expensive motherboards and coolers.

0 Likes

Here's some interesting news. AMD is reportedly in advanced talks to buy Xilinx for $30 billion. Wouldn't it be nice if they spent 0.01% of that in order to shore up their graphics software and bring closer to feature parity so Radeon wouldn't be the "value choice" first?

https://www.tomshardware.com/news/amd-reportedly-in-advanced-talks-to-buy-xilinx-for-roughly-dollar30-billion

Cool can we get them to spend some money on hiring more GPU driver engineers? LOL

0 Likes

Sort of in the opposite boat.  I have an X470 based system now, so I could essentially just grab a 5000 series and drop it in without any other investment.  Unfortunate that the price went up $50 at each level.

0 Likes

Is the one way BIOS flash for your X470 Motherboard available yet?
Are you happy to take the risk that it will work?
I have Asus ROG Crosshair Hero Wifi motherboards.
Go take a look at the number of BIOS Updates that were done on that Motherboard just to get it to run stable with Ryzen 2700x and Ryzen 3000 series CPUs and various DRAM.
For me, one way BIOS Flash = no way.

0 Likes

I forgot to post the slides at the end of the presentation which show some information on presented data.

Here they are:

pastedImage_1.png
pastedImage_2.png
pastedImage_4.png

I didn't really have many stability issues with various UEFI releases.  I'll wait for actual reviews on 11/5 and see if the IPC gains are really what AMD is claiming.  No UEFI updates supporting the 5000 series yet, I'm sure the X570/B550 will be updated before the upgrades eventually migrate down to the X470 series.

0 Likes

I would have to have enough people before me saying it works fine before I would take that risk. I think this whole one way is crap. Makes no sense at all. You should be able to flash back an earlier bios. 

It is crap.  AMD is adding support in for 5000 series for 400 series chipset users, but just deleting the entire old ROM set that includes support for 1000, 2000, and 3000 series.  They have enough space to have made a UEFI that say supports both 3000, and 5000 only deleting the previous two, but that was apparently too much work for users who don't constantly upgrade.

What I don't get is for instance on my Tomahawk B450. It has the flashback button. So it makes no sense whatever the current bios is that you can't load another.

0 Likes

I agree on the price hike. I thought at first it was the same as before that we have just had the price go down since launch. Then when you realize that a key factor on Zen3 being so much better is because of how much better the yields are in 7nm now that must mean the the chips are even cheaper to make so I think AMD adding a price was more because they can and thumbing their nose at Intel in the process. I hope that price quickly drops $50 bucks. However if it doesn't, this is what free market is all about. Get while the getting is good. 

0 Likes

I don't begrudge them trying to make a little more money, because Zen 3 will undoubtedly sell in fewer numbers than Zen 2, simply because it's the end of the road for AM4. DDR5 and PCIe 5, and likely USB4, will be on the next platform, 19% IPC sounds good on paper but in practice it's nothing to win over current Ryzen 3000 series owners nor Intel 10000 series owners, and it really has no effect whatsoever on 4K gamers, as shown with the 3080's CPU benchmarks, undoubtedly why AMD said "ultimate 1080p processor", though if you look at them not even the 3080 can do 1080p144 minimum ultra details.

And honestly it's going to be very difficult to recommend Zen 3 over Zen 2, both at retail and the used market, and that's assuming the retail market sells out in the next year, after which the proximity of Zen 4's release makes upgrading completely out of the question. I say that because if you take a look at Newegg, they still have Ryzen 2000 series processors in stock they can't shift.

So really overall, to me, Zen 3 is just a good idea in theory, bad idea in practice, and may come back to bite them, as a quick look at their stock is showing investors are not taking the bait, they're waiting, likely, to see if Big Navi is another bomb.

0 Likes

About the only way I can see myself buying a 5900x would be in over a year from now. If my B450 board shows that it supports it with good stability and no performance penalty other than the lack of PCIe 4, I could see myself maybe giving my 3700x to my kid to replace the 3600 and possibly getting that 5900 to get a couple more years out of the B450 board. It really mostly depends on what kind of deal is available at the time. 

For instance I really expected the 3xxx chips to be even cheaper at this point but they have actually gone up in price. My 3700x is 10 bucks more right now than I paid for it and the 3600 is 30 bucks more. 

0 Likes

If anything I'd only be interested in an X570 motherboard so I'd be set for the future. Right now, due to the 1 M.2 slot on my board, I'm having use adapter cards which cuts my x16 GPU slot to x8, and takes up the rest of my expansion slots. GDDR5 will be of no use outside the server and HEDT market, aside form APUs, same with PCIe 5.0, and it will be some time before USB 4 becomes of use.

Sadly as there's no X670 chipset, those Intel-like expensive X570 motherboards shall remain that way for the next two years...

0 Likes

I do nothing at this point that I need the extras that x570 brings. My b450 is cheap and very stable. I would not want a 570 as I think it is the end of the line. Zen4 likely will need a new MB. So that to me will be the time to invest again and maybe get an upgrade or 2 out of that board. 

0 Likes

Zen 4 will need a new motherboard because of DDR5, but Zen 2 and 3 are fast enough to keep games from being bottlenecked for quite a while, as the 3080 has shown that games can't even take full advantage of their power yet.

0 Likes

Not to mention that as game engines are updated to use more cores the 3900x and 3950x will likely improve as well.

0 Likes

AMD's RX 6000 GPU benchmarks put it seriously close to Nvidia's RTX 3080. Maybe even ahead | PC Game... 

"But one of the reasons those numbers might look very different on our own rigs is because, if AMD's CPU performance numbers ring true, and the Ryzen 9 5900X is, on average 26 percent quicker than the Ryzen 9 3900X, that will have a big impact on our own Nvidia numbers. 

In my testing, at 4K, the 10700K is some 5 percent quicker than the 3900X in gaming tests. If we're conservative in our Ryzen 5000 performance bumps and suggest a 4K fps boost of just 10 percent over the Intel chip, that still puts the RTX 3080 ahead even in Borderlands 3."

0 Likes

RE: they're waiting, likely, to see if Big Navi is another bomb.

Not long to wait.

0 Likes