PC Processors

[al_amd]

Hi,

I upgraded my system and have been having problems with it since.  Searching the net has reveled many problems with the 2400g.  My configuration is

Motherboard: gigabyte ab350m-ds3h

                       asus prime b350m-e

Memory: hx424c15fb2/8

HD: wd 1tb, gold series

OS: fedora 27

I have tried two different mb with similar results.

Minor issues 1: Takes a long time for display to refresh if it has been idle for sometime.

                      2: A number of boots error are present

Major issue: 1.  System crashes very frequently and I have to reboot.

Booting and other errors

[	0.000000] ACPI Error: [SMIC] Namespace lookup failure, AE_ALREADY_EXISTS (20170831/dswload-378)
[	0.000000] ACPI Exception: AE_ALREADY_EXISTS, During name lookup/catalog (20170831/psobject-252)
[	0.000000] ACPI Exception: AE_ALREADY_EXISTS, (SSDT:  AMD PT) while loading table (20170831/tbxfload-228)
[	0.000000] ACPI Error: 1 table load failures, 7 successful (20170831/tbxfload-246)

[	0.037360] ACPI Error: [PTOS] Namespace lookup failure, AE_NOT_FOUND (20170831/psargs-364)
[	0.037368] ACPI Error: Method parse/execution failed \, AE_NOT_FOUND (20170831/psparse-550)
[	0.384860] AMD-Vi: Unable to write to IOMMU perm counter.

[	4.027702] [drm:construct [amdgpu]] *ERROR* construct: Invalid Connector ObjectID from Adapter Service for connector index:2!
[	4.027745] [drm:construct [amdgpu]] *ERROR* construct: Invalid Connector ObjectID from Adapter Service for connector index:3!
[	4.076494] [drm:generic_reg_wait [amdpgu]] *ERROR* REG_WAIT timeout 1us * 100 tries - tgn10_lock line: 566
[	4.769215] sd 10:0:0:0: [sdb] No Caching mode page found
[	4.769239] sd 10:0:0:0: [sdb] Assuming drive cache: write through

Any advice?  If there is  a warranty for the 2400g, I believe I wish to act upon it but I do not know how to initiate the process.  Very limited

contact information  available.

Thanks.

[dl9220]

What kernel ? Did you update BIOS ?

cheers

[al_amd]

Hi,

I have tried all the current kernels4.15.17-300.fc27.x86_64

4.16.3-200.fc27.x86_644.16.4-200.fc27.x86_644.16.5-200.fc27.x86_64

Actually the 4.15.17-300.fc27.x86_64 kernel may have worked the best.

On the gigabyte board, it came with bios F21 which was to work but I loaded the most recent bios, F23d, for the mb and no difference.On the asus board, it came with bios 3803 but the website says for the w400g, it should have 3203.  The website says the 3803 is for the 1600 and 1600x processor but I assume 3803 is more current.

Thanks.

Al

From: dl9220 <amd-external@jiveon.com>

To: Max Gordon <att80@att.net>

Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2018 7:10 AM

Subject: Re: 2400g boot errors and crashes | AMD DevelopForums

#yiv0685182436 * #yiv0685182436 a #yiv0685182436 body {font-family:Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;}#yiv0685182436 #yiv0685182436 h1, #yiv0685182436 h2, #yiv0685182436 h3, #yiv0685182436 h4, #yiv0685182436 h5, #yiv0685182436 h6, #yiv0685182436 p, #yiv0685182436 hr {}#yiv0685182436 .yiv0685182436button td {}

|

Community

Re: 2400g boot errors and crashes

in Processors What kernel ? Did you update BIOS ?cheers Reply to this message by replying to this email -or- go to the message on Community  SHARE THE LOVE! Help other developers by marking replies to your questions as Helpful or Correct. If you are the original question asker, you can mark replies as Helpful or Correct by:

- Go to the message on Community (you’ll need to log in).

- Click on either the Helpful Answer button or the Correct Answer button.

- Pat yourself on the back! You’ve helped others who have the same question as you by telling them which replies are helpful and correct.

This email was sent by Community because you are a registered user.

You may unsubscribe instantly from Community, or adjust email frequency in your email preferences

|

[dl9220]

High,

I suppose you're using precompiled kernel from the OS-vendor ?

Few years ago I switched from that kind of packages to a 'more generic' kernel. At that time I was on Mint, with it's own kernel. Turned out, the Ubuntu generic low latency kernel was more up to it, and (microseconds) faster. Dunno if that works for your OS, or even there's a chance to try low latency.

Cheers