I went to India once and gave a talk about a sketch of proof of why consistent countable or recursive classical logic is inadequate to develop a theory of everything.
I might be a crank, crackpot, or clown, but how would you know?
| Solutions | 0 |
| Likes Given | 1 |
| Likes Received | 5 |
| Member Since | 10-23-2017 |
