So, Cinebench R20 has been released through the Microsoft and Apple stores Cinebench R20 Released - ONLY through Microsoft & Apple stores so let's get to posting a good set of scores. They (Maxon) said it takes 8x the power of Cinebench R15, so you can't compare scores backwards. Be warned, the single core test takes a -long- time. Also include your RAM speed as well.
Intel folks don't be afraid to chime in.
Results so far:
Windows 10 Build | CPU | Speed | Cores/Threads | RAM Speed | CPU Score | Single Core Score | MP Ratio |
PCWorld | Xeon W3175X | 3.1ghz | 28/56 | - | 13035 | 418 | 31.18 |
PCWorld | Threadripper 2990WX | 3.0ghz | 32/64 | - | 11812 | 425 | 27.79 |
17763 | Threadripper 2950X | 3.5ghz | 16/32 | DDR4-3200 | 7776 | 446 | 17.45 |
17763 | Threadripper 1950X | 4.1ghz | 16/32 | - | 7775 | 416 | 18.7 |
17763 | Ryzen 2700X | 4.3ghz | 8/16 | - | 4422 | - | - |
17763 | Ryzen 7 2700X | 4.1ghz | 8/16 | DDR4-3200 | 4209 | 426 | 9.89 |
17763 | Ryzen 7 2700X | 3.7ghz | 8/16 | - | 4055 | 437 | 9.29 |
16299 | Ryzen 7 1800X | 3.98ghz | 8/16 | DDR4-3200 | 3792 | 401 | 9.46 |
17763 | Ryzen 7 1700X | 3.4ghz | 8/16 | - | 3469 | 361 | 9.61 |
17763 | Ryzen 7 2700 | 3.2ghz | 8/16 | - | 3448 | 411 | 8.39 |
17763 | Ryzen 5 2600X | 3.6ghz | 6/12 | DDR4-3200 | 3013 | 409 | 7.37 |
17763 | Ryzen 5 2600X | 3.6ghz | 6/12 | - | 2985 | - | - |
17763 | Ryzen 5 1600 | 3.2ghz | 6/12 | DDR4-2666 | 2570 | 354 | 7.26 |
Unknown | FX-8350 | 4ghz | 4/8 | - | 1221 | - | - |
17763 | FX-8350 | 4.02ghz | 4/8 | - | 1174 | - | - |
17763 | Ryzen 5 2500U (Mobile) | 2ghz | 4/8 | - | 1084 | 285 | 3.81 |
Build 16299 - Windows 10 1709
Build 17763 - Windows 10 1809
if you use ryzen power plan (or win 10 balanced) and set c states/coolnquiet enable (sorry i forgot which one), cpu will run @ lower clock while idle
I also found this screen the other night. Setting it to best performance made it try to stay in a boost state (3.95-4.25GHz) even at idle even though it was on the regular balanced profile and I do I have cool n' quite on. Leaving it in the middle gives me the behavior I want out of my system like the lower clocks and 30ish degree idle.
Also your timings for 3200MHz ram are similar to what I had when it was stable. My Trc was 76, Trfc was 528, and CR was 1. Funny thing on my kit was that the Trc for the XMP profile was 60 and it caused issues at 3200 even though it was a 3600 kit. Only now at 2933 it seems stable. I have not tried to go any lower yet... its a pain when the pc does not boot and then testing for a while to make sure things are good... I'm just happy things are running normal or maybe even above average for what I have with a little bit of tuning and time.
yes, power mode not at best performance, i thought that i have forgotten something!
about ram speed, to my experience, the most helpful setting is always the voltage (dram < 1.45 and soc < 1.2), then misc modes and procODT resistances. dram calculator for ryzen helps a lot
Ryzen 5 3600X
Memery running at 3200
Think something went wrong with this run.
I wish my cpu was this good.
Here's my score. dont understand anything about test. LOL cpu looks bad, single core looks good and mp ratio is horrible. everything is running at stock. also has 2-8gb of 3200 ddr4 g.skill aegis in it.
Remember to only compare like with like mate, there is no point in trying to compare with scores far higher than yours as they will be more powerful CPUs and overclocked as well.
Ryzen 7 2700X @4GHz @1.15V
to lazy to do single xD
Just finished this build last night. working on getting everything tweaked and perfect.
I9 9900k 5.3Ghz 1.368Vcore, 16Gb ram @ 3200mhz c16
16GB - DDR4 - 3000mHz RAM
my ryzen 5 3600 reach 3750 in multithread and 490 in single but I have overclocked at 4200mhz with 1.40v and ram at 3733mhz (3200 xmp) because if I put lower the test chrashed... v1.35 is good for 4050-4100mhz (temps 38-45 idle and 82 in full stress with arctic freezer esports 33 one)... damn I see people at 4200mhz with only 1.15-1.20v... so angryyyyy!!!! lol
This is my Phenom x6 1045T @ 3996MHz. I've currently got 12GB of single channel DDR3 @ 1578MHz, which is pretty much the maximum it can do (can't go very far beyond 1600MHz). I do wonder what its score would be with dual channel ram though, but I don't have two modules at hand right now.
I'm very surprised to see that it's apparently higher than a stock FX-8350, both single- and multithreaded. Still wouldn't really recommend a Phenom anymore though. With the GTX 1070 I've currently got it's bottleneck heaven. It's not so much the lack of raw power, it's just that modern games (and probably other programs!) really aren't optimized for Phenoms anymore. Games tend to stutter a lot without fully utilizing either a single cpu core, the gpu or the ram according to MSI Afterburner, and that's if they even launch at all. Many current games require instruction sets the Phenom doesn't support. The stutters might get better with dual channel ram, but the support surely won't.
Also, I might try a slightly more modern motherboard with a faster northbridge and HT-link some day. I've got a 780G board now and both the northbridge and HT-link are running at 2368MHz. I think newer boards would be running faster even without overclocking. Phenoms seem to be particularly picky with northbridge speeds, so there could be some performance to gain there. That'll probably only help in scenarios in which its bandwidth and/or latency are bottlenecking though. It could improve the stuttering when gaming, but I doubt it'll improve my Cinebench score by much.
So why am I still using a Phenom? Well, I've also got a Ryzen 7 2700, but my AM4 board broke and I've sent it back for warranty. And as a backup rig, a Phenom x6 isn't that bad at all .
PS: I'm running Windows 10 v2004 (19041.264)
3950X Stock + Arctic Freezer II 360 AIO
Windows 10 2004 Build
32GB 3600Mhz CL14
ST: 544 points
MT: 9658 points
Hi, new to this forum and new to pc building too. Can someone please tell me if this cinebench score is good? I can't find anything to compare it with the same specs. I can't get it to 4.5ghz too. The pc runs fine at 4.5ghz and managed to play games to test without crushing. But when I run cinebench r20 the pc just restarts and won't let me run cinebench. Thank you.
https://community.amd.com/thread/237502?messageTarget=all&start=25&mode=comments#comment-2933079
it is good.
if you want to oc to higher frequency, you need better cooler. 4.4GHz seems to be the limit on basic cooler for 3800x
You will always be gimped in AVX workloads such as Cinebench R20. Ryzen uses different EDC limits than what is listed in the motherboards when running those workloads. If you feel you have sufficient cooling headroom, you can bypass that using the EDC bug. Info here. You'll likely see a pronounced score increase.
https://www.overclock.net/forum/13-amd-general/1741052-edc-1-pbo-turbo-boost.html
10280
Ryzen 9 3950 - clocked to 4.375
Noctua Air cooler
Ryzen 7 1700 (3.95Ghz at 1.4v) - max temp 77C
NZXT Kraken X63
Gigabyte AX370 Gaming 5
Gigabyte Auros 2080TI Gaming OC 11GB
Corsair 16GB 3000 DDR4
3600 mhz cl16 Ram
No OC all stock
5600x @ 3.6 bpo (motherboard) enabled on B550 aorus pro AC, 16gb gskill 3600c16@stock, noctua d15 set to turbo
R7 2700X @4.1GHz 1.29V (4091MHz)
R5 2500U @30W TDP
that should read 4.6 not 3.6 :)
Brief test after changing the 16 gig 1600mhz over 16gig 2133mhz