cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

General Discussions

An enterprise SSD flaw will brick hardware after exactly 40,000 hours

Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE) has warned that certain SSD drives could fail catastrophically if buyers don't take action soon. Due to a firmware bug, the products in question will be bricked exactly 40,000 hours (four years, 206 days and 16 hours) after the SSD has entered service. "After the SSD failure occurs, neither the SSD nor the data can be recovered," the company warned in a customer service bulletin.

This type of issue would be terrible for consumers, but it's catastrophic for the enterprises that buy such drives. According to HPE's product description, they're designed for "big data analytics, cloud computing, active archiving, database applications and data warehousing." HPE sold them as standalone drives, but also as part if its HPE ProLiant, Synergy and other storage products.

A failure would be particularly disastrous in large RAID systems where the drives are usually used. Normally, the data is still protected in a RAID even if one or several drives fail. However, RAIDs are usually built with new drives purchased all at once, and as HPE pointed out, "SSDs which were put into service at the same time will likely fail nearly simultaneously." If that were to happen, companies would lose huge amounts of data.

Several HPE models are affected

The drives in question are 800GB and 1.6TB SAS models and storage products listed in the service bulletin here. It applies to any products with HPD7 or earlier firmware. HPE also includes instructions on how to update the firmware and check the total time on the drive to best plan an upgrade. According to HPE, the drives could start failing as early as October this year.

An enterprise SSD flaw will brick hardware after exactly 40,000 hours | Engadget 

4 Replies

HPE SSD drive problems sure have been abundant. I still use hard disks galore and so far they have been trouble free.

Seagate has been reliable for me.

0 Likes

I think they had already fixed them breaking at like 32 I guess nobody knew that 40 would be an issue?

0 Likes

I think that the CPU used on the units may be overflowing a smaller register. I have often ranted over the short word problem and the limitations of small containers for data.

0 Likes
kenyomurabu
Adept II

And to think? This is a type of Drive you may want to use Cloud Data on, 
& yet we are hitting an ERA where Companies want to make everything run off a Cloud, 
even Consoles, & Windows it's self... 

Hmmmmm... 1 can only think what they are planning? o_@ 

You don't suspect that they might be up to something do you? Purposly trying to have PC's wiped out? o_@ 
Technology does seem to be going backwards quite a lot lately... (I for one haven't been happy about it)

0 Likes