3 Replies Latest reply on Jan 27, 2018 11:33 PM by goodplay

    R7 260x No Longer Supported On Windows 8.1?

    krysalis
    krysalis Jan 30, 2018 6:35 AM

      I wanted to update my driver, but 17.7.1 is so far the latest for this GPU, i checked for other more powerful new ones and new updates are all available for them. Does this mean AMD no longer supports drivers above 17.7.1?

       

      Message was edited by: Matt B We have updated the title of this discussion with relevant details to better describe your issue.

      • 294 Views
      • Tags:
        • Re: AMD doesnt support R7 260X anymore with new drivers?
          elstaci
          elstaci Jan 27, 2018 12:06 PM (in response to krysalis)

          Go here to AMD Support: Download Drivers and input the data. I used Desktop and Windows 10 x64, Since you didn't post your computer specs, and found driver from 1/18/2018 to download.

           

          Manually Select Your Driver

           

          Identify your AMD graphic hardware and operating system using the drop-down menus below.

          Step 1:  Select the type of product that you have:

          Step 2:  Select the product family your product belongs to:

          Step 3:  Select your product:

          Step 4:  Select the supported operating system that you have:

           

           

          1 of 1 people found this helpful
          • Re: AMD doesnt support R7 260X anymore with new drivers?
            emilioarg
            emilioarg Jan 27, 2018 12:06 PM (in response to krysalis)

            AMD didn't finish the support, the Adrenalin Edition 17.12.1 is compatible whit your r7 260x.

            Download Drivers

            1 of 1 people found this helpful
            • Re: AMD doesnt support R7 260X anymore with new drivers?
              goodplay
              goodplay Jan 27, 2018 11:33 PM (in response to krysalis)

              Still using win8.1 ?, then nope, no newer drivers for that OS.

              Some suggest the win7 drivers work with it ? 

              2 of 2 people found this helpful