Well. This is not a "bug" or a "issue" that can be brought up in the issue reporting form.
They knowingly pulled 21:9 support from being able to work with Virtual Super Resoloution...
It was working completely fine, but for some reason they now state that "21:9" is not supported.....
But somehow they still manage to provide VSR for 2560x1440p?...
1800p is not a resolution.I am assuming you mean 3200x1800 as it is the only one supported by VSR, 2880x1800 is not, but it is 16:9 and not 21:9, and has only worked on 1920x1080 and 2560x1440 displays.
Target Display Timing Supported VSR Modes 1366 X 768 @ 60Hz 1600 X 900
1920 X 1080
1600 X 900 @ 60Hz 1920 X 1080 1920 X 1080 @ 60Hz 2560 X 1440
3200 X 1800
3840 X 2160 (AMD Radeon™ R9 285, AMD Radeon™ R9 Fury Series)
1920 X 1200 @ 60Hz 2048 X 1536
2560 X 1600
3840 X 2400 (AMD Radeon™ R9 285, AMD Radeon™ R9 Fury Series)
2560 X 1440 @ 60Hz 3200 X 1800
Well, im pretty sure you understood what i ment. The "supported" modes tell me nothing, considering i was running 2560x1080p -------> 3200 X 1800 on my 29 inch 21:9 display,
I was not running 1920x1200, or 1920x1080........
Nothing? any AMD folks that can tell me why?
I was wondering the same. I was about to buy 34um67 from LG but then I notice VSR is not supported. So I'm waiting now and the Gigabyte Fury card is on hold too. Can't afford "bigger" monitor ( resolution ) so it's a bummer for me.
Has there any response from AMD , different then :" We're always looking at ways we can improve the VSR technology. This includes adding support for more resolutions, more aspect ratio's and more graphics cards. As soon as we have anything to announce regarding this, we'll let everyone know about it. " ?