With kernel w/o branching CodeXL gives me time to time just weird values for many counters.
How could one trust program that returns such data? how to avoid such indeterministic behavior in current CodeXL version? Can AMD make next version of CodeXL profiler more reflecting reality ? >69k of waves instead of usual 8k and almost the same kernel running time... not too wrong?? And not only waves couner gives odd results looks like time to time whole kernel run is wrong!
And please make possible in next version to copy/paste as text table these counter tables. Printscreen not the best way to share such text data...