arsenm

Constant memory in 2.3?

Discussion created by arsenm on Dec 16, 2010
Latest reply on Dec 20, 2010 by Rom1

I have a kernel that worked correctly in 2.2. When I tried running it after the 2.3 update, my kernel appears to do nothing and finishes almost instantly compared to how long it should take. If I do a #define __constant __global at the top, it starts working again (although much slower than before). Did something change that would somehow break constant memory?

Outcomes