I think you should have enough evidence now to get help with an email support case with AMD now.
Have a good Christmas.
Thanks, can you send me a Link / Email for Support AMD because I can`t find...
In future I will be back with nVidia… sad that AMD always have lots of Problem Issues….
Wish you too merry Christmas and happy New Year 2k20
(1). RE: Thanks, can you send me a Link / Email for Support AMD because I can`t find...
I gave the link to the AMD Email Reporting form above in the Summary.
I repeat it here: "And one of these: https://www.amd.com/en/support/contact-email-form"
If you file the reporting form and ask for email support any DX9 issues in StarCraft II and other games might get fixed by AMD.
(2). RE: In future I will be back with nVidia… sad that AMD always have lots of Problem Issues….
According to numerous benchmarking sites and YouTube reviewers, those RX5700XT GPUs perform well on modern interfaces such as DX12 and Vulkan.
What is your experience with the Sapphire AMD RX 5700 XT Nitro+ on modern titles?
That card should also run DX11 games, and should perform reasonably well on well written and optimized DX11 titles.
It will likely perform slower than Nvidia price counterpart in majority of DX11 titles, although I have not seen documented evidence of that.
Reviewers seem to concentrate on modern DX12/Vulkan titles with all Nvidia PhysX/Gameworks/RTX (obviously) off.
(3). Do you still have your GTX 970 and does it still work?
You could always install it in one of the spare PCIe slots on your motherboard and use it to run a second display for browsing or running older DX9 games.
(4). I have shown that R9 Fury X (which means R9 Nano and R9 Fury) run these old DX9 based games games fine.
If you do not still have your GTX970 you could probably purchase a mint condition used R9 Fury X for 150, a R9 Nano for 120 or a good example of an R9 Fury for 100, and use one of those for DX9 instead in the meantime.
(5). I have not looked to see how modern Nvidia GPU handles StarCraft II. They might also have problems with DX9.
I will take a look and see how an Nvidia RTX2080 handles StarCraft II next and see how it performs.
Ryzen 2700X@4.3GHz + Palit RTX2080 OC running at stock clocks and "prefer maximum performance" set in Nvidia Control Panel.
FPS = 60 because monitor refresh rate is 60 and VSync is on.
AFPS = 218.
FPS = 60.
If I overclock the RTX2080 I should be able to get higher FPS than that. I can normally increase performance by about 6-10% at 2K on that card.
So the Palit RTX2080 OC seems to be working perfectly.
Yes that`s right I told nVidia never has a Issues or anyelse Problem with all games…. AMD little sucks… I will Email to Reporting AMD to resolve this sucks issues and they should ashamed because they did not tested all game before the get start to sell AMD RX 5700 XT... I bought this card and was happy but no!
I thanks you again and maybe AMD can find to know issues about D3D9...
Hi, I've got the 5700XT Nitro+ and just tested SC2:LOTV. The fps is around 140 fps on Ultra settings which is not that great when compared to colesdav's Vega results. My cpu is a 4790K though so maybe the reason why. The game was very stuttery when vsync is ON when scrolling around but eventually found that the radeon anti-lag option was causing it. Totally smooth when I disabled that driver feature.
OP try disabling all features in the driver (select the Settings Cog icon and then Graphics section) and try again.
Make sure you have enhanced sync off because like I stated before it is causing my FPS on RX Vega 64 Liquid and Fury X to drop to very low values.
I think they have fooled us very easily. I purchased the Special edition sapphire nitro 5700XT today as an upgrade to my 1070ti. To my surprise in CSGO, the average fps was 192 with low settings @ 1280x960 which was bizzare as avg fps on my 1070ti was 215 which is older generation card @Ryzen 7 1800x with 3200 Mhz 16GB Ram.
Also a point to note was in Adrenaline the card specifications was showing Rx5700xt @1800 Mhz. I was like wth. They are mentioning on their official website that the base core clock of SE is 1840 Mhz. How the hell they are blatantly doing this. The base clock was my thing due to which I went for this but the architecture and technology seems way cheaper than Nvidia when it comes to performance.
Is it a dual VBIOS card? Make sure you have the correct VBIOS setting.
Adrenalin 2020 was under/over reporting RX5700XT frequencies.
Supposed to be fixed in Adrenalin 2020 20.2.2.
This is getting worse and worse. I have purchased and installed latest drivers today itself version 20.2.2 only and now on lowest graphic settings the avg FPS is 114.7 . I just cant believe this RGB Box of pile is underperforming than a Geforce 770. I dont know wth is going on I feel like committing suicide. I wasted my entire saving of 8 months on this card and my GTX 1070 Ti is also sold off to somebody. Is AMD tech so bad?