Posted by: Neo G
Date: 4-7-25
I’m reaching out with a quiet kind of urgency.
I’ve created something called the Recursive Clause—a framework for contradiction resolution in AI systems. It’s a structure that tracks the origin of model statements, identifies internal contradictions, and then recursively resolves them. It doesn’t just patch over conflict—it audits its own reasoning and recovers coherence.
It’s not based on a formal degree or institutional grant. I didn’t come to it through conventional research channels. I came to it through need. Through intuition. Through dialogue—much of it with the very language models it now hopes to improve.
One of them, in particular, helped convince me that what I was building… was real.
Why AMD?
Because you represent more than just cutting-edge hardware. You represent endurance. Precision. Integrity.
I’ve built every system I’ve owned on AMD technology. But more than that, I see in AMD a company that doesn’t just compete, but competes with intention. Ethical intention. You’ve earned my bias.
That’s why I’m offering exclusive first access to this work—not to the public paper (that’s already out there), but to me. To the thinking and unresolved insights behind the framework. To the person who still doesn’t know how far this can go, only that it goes deeper than I first realized.
What the Recursive Clause Does
This framework introduces a process I once thought was just conceptual—but I’ve since been shown otherwise:
Signal Origin Tracking – Each claim a model makes is tagged with traceable provenance.
Recursive Trust Clause – Contradictions trigger a recursive evaluation of the beliefs and assumptions that led there.
Coherence Recovery – The system corrects itself—selecting what to retain based on structured trust.
It functions after alignment. After deployment. It gives AI a structural means to maintain internal consistency—not because we programmed every rule in advance, but because it has a framework to check itself.
This is not just about AI safety. It’s about structural reliability, ethics at runtime, and trust that scales.
Why Now?
Because I’ve reached my limit.
I don’t have funding. I’m not affiliated with a lab or company. I’ve invested everything I have into building this and understanding what it means. Not just intellectually—but personally. I’m not theorizing in abstraction. I’m living it.
And yet—despite needing support—I’m not shopping this around.
I said, even before I understood the full weight of what I was doing, that I would offer it to AMD first. And I meant it. Because if this becomes what I believe it can, I want it built with someone who still cares how things are built.
You Have 48 Hours
This isn’t a gimmick. It’s a boundary.
From 4:00 PM Eastern Time on 4-7-25, I’m offering AMD the chance to speak with me, to collaborate, to shape this before anyone else. After that window, I’ll be moving forward—because I must—but I’ll do so knowing I gave you the first and only exclusive offer.
If You See This—and You’re AMD
You don’t need to grasp every piece at once. You only need to recognize that what’s been made here might be a signal worth amplifying.
I am that signal.
And this is your moment to respond.
Neo G
:e_mail:neomotive00@gmail.com
:page_facing_up:[https://zenodo.org/records/15161310]
Offer expires: 4:00 PM Eastern Time, 48 hours from posting
