Does anyone have a direct link to the OpenCL 1.1 download archive page?
I need 1.1 as it's still our internal standard until Nvidia and Intel support it.
I followed the AMD Web page link to the archive page and completed the questionnaire and submitted
my answers to get a nice 404 page not found.
Can anyone PLEASE post a direct link to the archive page??
which OpenCL 1.1 download archive page that gave out this error? Can you show the link?
The archive versions of the AMD APP SDK has a questionnaire page as a gatekeeper at the following URL
http://developer.amd.com/tools/hc/AMDAPPSDK/downloads/pages/AMDAPPArchive.aspx
Complete the questionnaire and submit your answers to get a 404 page not found!
When the second submit button is clicked, it posts the results to surveymonkey. This responds with a 404 Page Not Found. I suggest you look
at the surveymonkey URI that is suposed to redirect you to the archives page. Please check that URI for the archives exists? Is the URL coded in the
surveymonkey redirect correct?
Why do we have to debug AMD web sites too?
http://developer.amd.com/tools/hc/AMDAPPSDK/downloads/pages/AMDAPPSDKDownloadArchive.aspx
The new link WORKS NOW...
Tim,
Out of interest... Assuming you specify CL_USE_DEPRECATED_OPENCL_1_1_APIS or whatever the flag is, what is there about the latest SDK that doesn't work for 1.1?
Lee,
The things that hold my team back from moving to latest APP SDK are Ignorance, Infrastructure and Timing.
1) Ignorance of the CL_USE_DEPRECATED_OPENCL_1_1_APIS macro functionality. We need to look again at the feature delta between 1.2 and 1.2 as we missed that one.
2) Infrastructure - we can't just upgrade a team to the latest version. We need to add nodes Windows/Linux APU/GPU
to test the latest release in a sandbox before we roll it out. Adding more H/W needs a more K Watts we don't have without rewiring.
3) Timing - We have frozen the BOM for a release. So once we have released, fixed any post release bugs we can look into an upgrade to OpenCL latest.
Regards
-Tim
That makes perfect sense. I just thought it best to check if we were missing anything in the distribution.