cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Archives Discussions

CodeMan
Journeyman III

AMD Matrix Multiply kernel

AMD Matrix Multiply kernel

Hi,

I am new to OpenCL, i want to use the AMD Matrix multiply kernel for comuting large Matrices (greater than 64 size matrix as given in the AMD SDK example)

What changes i need in the following kernel if i want to compute a 1024*1024 matrices

Kernel code:

#define TILEX 4
#define TILEX_SHIFT 2
#define TILEY 4
#define TILEY_SHIFT 2

/* Output tile size : 4x4 = Each thread computes 16 float values*/
/* Required global threads = (widthC / 4, heightC / 4) */
/* This kernel runs on 7xx and CPU as they don't have hardware local memory */
__kernel void mmmKernel(__global float4 *matrixA,
                        __global float4 *matrixB,
                        __global float4* matrixC,
            uint widthA, uint widthB)
{
    int2 pos = (int2)(get_global_id(0), get_global_id(1));
 
    float4 sum0 = (float4)(0);
    float4 sum1 = (float4)(0);
    float4 sum2 = (float4)(0);
    float4 sum3 = (float4)(0);
 
    /* Vectorization of input Matrices reduces their width by a factor of 4 */
    widthB /= 4;

    for(int i = 0; i < widthA; i=i+4)
    {
        float4 tempA0 = matrixA[i/4 + (pos.y << TILEY_SHIFT) * (widthA / 4)];
        float4 tempA1 = matrixA[i/4 + ((pos.y << TILEY_SHIFT) + 1) * (widthA / 4)];
        float4 tempA2 = matrixA[i/4 + ((pos.y << TILEY_SHIFT) + 2) * (widthA / 4)];
        float4 tempA3 = matrixA[i/4 + ((pos.y << TILEY_SHIFT) + 3) * (widthA / 4)];

        //Matrix B is not transposed
        float4 tempB0 = matrixB[pos.x + i * widthB];   
        float4 tempB1 = matrixB[pos.x + (i + 1) * widthB];
        float4 tempB2 = matrixB[pos.x + (i + 2) * widthB];
        float4 tempB3 = matrixB[pos.x + (i + 3) * widthB];

        sum0.x += tempA0.x * tempB0.x + tempA0.y * tempB1.x + tempA0.z * tempB2.x + tempA0.w * tempB3.x;
        sum0.y += tempA0.x * tempB0.y + tempA0.y * tempB1.y + tempA0.z * tempB2.y + tempA0.w * tempB3.y;
        sum0.z += tempA0.x * tempB0.z + tempA0.y * tempB1.z + tempA0.z * tempB2.z + tempA0.w * tempB3.z;
        sum0.w += tempA0.x * tempB0.w + tempA0.y * tempB1.w + tempA0.z * tempB2.w + tempA0.w * tempB3.w;

        sum1.x += tempA1.x * tempB0.x + tempA1.y * tempB1.x + tempA1.z * tempB2.x + tempA1.w * tempB3.x;
        sum1.y += tempA1.x * tempB0.y + tempA1.y * tempB1.y + tempA1.z * tempB2.y + tempA1.w * tempB3.y;
        sum1.z += tempA1.x * tempB0.z + tempA1.y * tempB1.z + tempA1.z * tempB2.z + tempA1.w * tempB3.z;
        sum1.w += tempA1.x * tempB0.w + tempA1.y * tempB1.w + tempA1.z * tempB2.w + tempA1.w * tempB3.w;

        sum2.x += tempA2.x * tempB0.x + tempA2.y * tempB1.x + tempA2.z * tempB2.x + tempA2.w * tempB3.x;
        sum2.y += tempA2.x * tempB0.y + tempA2.y * tempB1.y + tempA2.z * tempB2.y + tempA2.w * tempB3.y;
        sum2.z += tempA2.x * tempB0.z + tempA2.y * tempB1.z + tempA2.z * tempB2.z + tempA2.w * tempB3.z;
        sum2.w += tempA2.x * tempB0.w + tempA2.y * tempB1.w + tempA2.z * tempB2.w + tempA2.w * tempB3.w;

        sum3.x += tempA3.x * tempB0.x + tempA3.y * tempB1.x + tempA3.z * tempB2.x + tempA3.w * tempB3.x;
        sum3.y += tempA3.x * tempB0.y + tempA3.y * tempB1.y + tempA3.z * tempB2.y + tempA3.w * tempB3.y;
        sum3.z += tempA3.x * tempB0.z + tempA3.y * tempB1.z + tempA3.z * tempB2.z + tempA3.w * tempB3.z;
        sum3.w += tempA3.x * tempB0.w + tempA3.y * tempB1.w + tempA3.z * tempB2.w + tempA3.w * tempB3.w;
    }
    matrixC[pos.x + ((pos.y <<  TILEY_SHIFT) + 0) * widthB] = sum0;
    matrixC[pos.x + ((pos.y <<  TILEY_SHIFT) + 1) * widthB] = sum1;
    matrixC[pos.x + ((pos.y <<  TILEY_SHIFT) + 2) * widthB] = sum2;
    matrixC[pos.x + ((pos.y <<  TILEY_SHIFT) + 3) * widthB] = sum3;
}

0 Likes
1 Reply
nareshsankapelly
Journeyman III

Hi CodeMan,

You don't need to change the kernel at all. You can give command line options as MatrixMultiplication.exe -x 1024 -y 1024 -z 1024.   

0 Likes